通信原理论文(中英文版)
更新时间:2023-03-08 17:17:17 阅读量: 综合文库 文档下载
- 通信原理课程论文推荐度:
- 相关推荐
Optimized Pulse Shaping for Intra-channel
Nonlinearities Mitigation in a 10 Gbaud Dual-Polarization 16-QAM System
Beno?t Chatelain1, Charles Laperle2, Kim Roberts2, Xian Xu1, Mathieu Chagnon1, Andrzej Borowiec2, Fran?ois Gagnon3, John C. Cartledge4, and David V. Plant1
1McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2A7 2Ciena Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K2H 8E9
3école de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3C 1K3 4Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L
3N6 Email: benoit.chatelain@mail.mcgill.ca
Abstract: An optimized pulse shape is shown to reduce intra-channel nonlinear effects in a 10 Gbaud dual-polarization 16-QAM EDFA-amplified system without optical dispersion compensation.
OCIS codes: (060.2330) Fiber optics communications; (060.4080) Modulation
1. Introduction
Intra-channel nonlinear distortion is an important source of signal degradation in optical
communication systems using advanced modulation formats such as quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). Its main impact is to reduce the maximal power that can be launched into the fiber, thereby limiting optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) levels at the receiver, reducing system margins and reducing the maximum propagation distance that can be achieved. In this paper, the nonlinear tolerance of an optimized pulse and a root-raised cosine (RRC) pulse is compared in terms of bit error rate (BER) performance, for varying propagation distances and launch powers. Experimental results show that the optimized pulse considerably reduces intra-channel nonlinear effects in a long haul, 10 Gbaud dual-polarization (DP) 16-QAM system relying on erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) and G.652 fiber (no optical dispersion compensation).
The improved nonlinear tolerance of the return-to-zero (RZ) pulse shape was recently highlighted in [1], for a 112 Gb/s DP-quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) system without optical dispersion compensation. Comparing the RZ pulse to the non return-to-zero (NRZ) pulse, the authors reported an increase in single channel maximum propagation distance of 18%. However, the improved nonlinear tolerance achieved using the RZ pulse comes at the expense of increased spectral content. For instance, the bandwidth of a 50% RZ pulse is twice the bandwidth of the NRZ pulse or the RRC pulse with a roll-off factor (α) of 1. The use of a RZ pulse thus reduces spectral efficiency by a factor of two, and for a system using digital signal processing at the transmitter and receiver, at the Nyquist rate, it doubles the required bandwidth and sampling frequency of the digital-to-analog converters (DACs) and analog-to-digital converters (ADCs).
(a)
(b)
Figure 1. Impulse (a) and frequency (b) responses of the RRC and optimized pulses.
In comparison to the RRC pulse, the optimized pulse shape presented in [2] was shown to improve
the nonlinear performance of DP-QPSK systems without optical dispersion compensation and to increase the maximum transmission distance by as much as 22%. The specialized pulse was obtained by numerical optimization, with the primary objective formulated to reduce its width, but constrained to have a bandwidth equal to the bandwidth of a NRZ or RRC pulse (α = 1). Therefore, the optimized pulse can be used without penalizing spectral efficiency and without using higher speed DACs and ADCs. Fig. 1 exhibits the time and frequency characteristics of the optimized and RRC pulses. It can be seen that the optimized pulse is narrower than the RRC pulse with α = 1, and that its first-null bandwidth is equal to the baud rate. It is also apparent that the reduced width of the optimized pulse translates in higher energy content for frequencies between 6 GHz and 10 GHz. Through dispersion, the higher energy frequencycomponents produce a propagating pulse and a propagating waveform that is more broadened, with lower peak power excursions. Since intra-channel nonlinear distortion is proportional to peak power, the optimized pulse makes the system more tolerant to nonlinear effects. In this work and as in [2?5], the RRC pulse is used as the reference pulse for its ability to minimize pulse-induced intersymbol interference (ISI) and to minimize out-of-band power.
2. Experimental Setup
Fig. 2 illustrates the experimental setup. The symbol sources consist of random symbol sequences of length 214 and were followed by pulse shaping finite impulse response (FIR) filters. DACs with 6-bit resolution drive the in-phase-quadrature (I-Q) modulators associated with the two polarizations. The emitting wavelength was set to 1547.715 nm. A polarization scrambler (PS) was inserted after the polarization beam combiner (PBC) in order to randomly rotate the polarization state. A fiber link consisting of 15 spans of 80 km G.652 fiber was used, together with EDFAs at each span. At the receiver, a noise source was used to adjust the OSNR. The optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) served the purposes of measuring the OSNR. A coherent front-end integrates polarization beam splitters, optical hybrids, a local oscillator and photodetectors [6]. It provides four signals corresponding to the in-phase and quadrature components of the two polarizations. These baseband signals were sampled using a 50 GSa/s oscilloscope with 8-bit ADCs and post-processed in a personal computer. The linewidth of the transmitter and receiver lasers was 100 kHz, and their frequency offset was below 200 MHz. The same clock reference was used for the DACs and ADCs. The receiver signal processing functions include matched filtering and chromatic dispersion compensation (CD-1) by FIR filters, polarization recovery by a 13-tap fractionally spaced (T/2) butterfly equalizer (EQ), carrier offset removal and carrier phase recovery by a second order phase lock loop (PLL) and finally, detection. The constant modulus algorithm (CMA) is used for the equalizer coefficients pre-convergence. Once the signal is recovered, the system switches to a decision-directed modulus algorithm (DDMA) [7]. Two symbol pattern periods, totaling 215 symbols for each polarization, were used to produce BER statistics.
In what follows, the system performance is studied using either the RRC pulse or the optimized pulse presented in Fig. 1 as transmit FIR filters and receive matched filters.
Figure 2. Experimental setup.
3. Results and Discussion
Fig. 3 displays the electrical eye diagrams of the signal in-phase component taken at the transmitter, after the FIR pulse shaping filter. The inner eye openings of the optimized 16-QAM sequence eye diagram are reduced compare to those in the eye diagram obtained using the RRC pulse, indicating, as mentioned in [2], that the optimized pulse may be more sensitive to timing jitter. Fig. 3 (b) further shows that the eye diagram obtained with the optimized pulse is very similar to the eye diagram that would be obtained using an RZ pulse, and that the optimized pulse sequence returns close to a zero level between each symbol period. Since the RRC and the optimized pulses are designed to be used as matched filter, it is expected to visualize on the eye diagrams at the transmitter a certain amount of ISI. The RRC and optimized pulses produce a filtered sequence with zero pulse-induced ISI only at the receiver, after matched filtering.
Fig. 4 (a) reports the measured BER in a back-to-back configuration for a system using RRC filters and for a system using optimized filters. The linear performance of the RRC and optimized pulses is very similar and for the considered range of OSNR, the minimal and maximal penalty is 2.5 dB and 6.5 dB, respectively. Fig. 4 (b) and (c) show propagation results for 800 km and for 1200 km. At 800 km and considering a BER threshold of 8×10-3, the optimized pulse reduces the OSNR penalty by 0.6 dB and 2.8 dB, for launch powers of –2 dBm and 0 dBm, respectively. At 1200 km and for a launch power of –2 dBm an improvement of 1.2 dB is observed. At 1200 km and for a launch power of 0 dBm, the system with optimized pulse shaping almost reaches the BER threshold, while the system using RRC pulses is limited to a BER of 1.8×10-2. At this level, the optimized pulse outperforms the RRC pulse by 4.3 dB. It should be noted that the introduction of soft-decision forward error correction (FEC) [8] would be required to be able to operate at the considered BER threshold.
(a) (b)
Fig.3. Measured 16-QAM eye-diagrams at the transmitter when using: (a) the RRC filter, and (b) the optimized filter.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4. BER vs OSNR (noise bandwidth = 0.1 nm) for back-to-back (a), 800 km (b) and 1200 km (c).
For systems using multi-bit DACs operating at the Nyquist rate, the main advantage of the optimized pulse approach is that it is implemented at no extra hardware or computational cost, since the optimized pulse shaping function replaces the existing shaping filters. Yet another option would be to synthesise the optimized pulse transfer function by analog filters, thus enabling the use of simpler 2-bit DAC structures clocked at the baud rate.
4. Conclusion
The characteristics of an optimized pulse shape specifically designed to increase the nonlinear tolerance of long-haul optical transport systems were described. The specialized pulse was used in a 10 Gbaud DP-16-QAM transmission experiment and was demonstrated to significantly reduce the impact of intra-channel nonlinearities.
The authors would like to acknowledge the NSERC/Bell Canada Industrial Research Chair Program.
5. References
[1] E. Torrengo, S. Makovejs, D. S. Millar, I. Fatadin, R. I. Killey, S. J. Savory, P. Bayvel, “Influence of pulse shape in 112Gbit/s WDM PDM-QPSK transmission,” accepted to IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., (2010).
[2] B. Chatelain, C. Laperle, D. Krause, K. Roberts, M. Chagnon, X. Xu, A. Borowiec, F. Gagnon, J. C. Cartledge, D. V. Plant, “SPM-tolerant pulse shaping for 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s dual-polarization QPSK systems,” accepted to IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., (2010).
[3] M. Nakazawa, S. Okamoto, T. Omiya, K. Kasai, M. Yoshida, “256-QAM (64 Gb/s) coherent optical transmission over 160 km with an optical bandwidth of 5.4 GHz,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 22, 185–187 (2010).
[4] I. Fatadin, D. Ives, S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightw. Technol, 27, 3042–3049, (2009).
[5] H. Goto, K. Kasai, M. Yoshida, M. Nakazawa, “Polarization-multiplexed 1 Gsymbol/s, 128 QAM (14 Gbit/s) coherent optical transmission over 160 km using a 1.4 GHz Nyquist filter,” in Proc. OFC/NFOEC 2008. [6] K. Roberts, M. O’Sullivan, K.-T. Wu, H. Sun, A. Awadalla, D. J. Krause, C. Laperle, “Performance of dual-polarization QPSK for optical transport systems,” J. Lightw. Technol., 27, 3546–3559, (2009). [7] C. A. R. Fernandes, G. Favier, J. C. M. Mota, “Decision directed adaptive blind equalization based on the constant modulus algorithm,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, 1, 333–346, (2007).
[8] K. Onohara, Y. Miyata, T. Sugihara, K. Kubo, H. Yoshida, T. Mizuochi, “Soft decision FEC for 100G transport systems,” in Proc. OFC/NFOEC 2010.
正在阅读:
通信原理论文(中英文版)03-08
未婚基督徒对婚姻的祷告06-03
关于实施新冠肺炎疫情精准防控的指导意见02-23
水上栈桥与施工平台施工方案12-01
高大模板支撑体系专项方案01-26
汽车牌照竞拍手续03-19
【2014】高考英语阅读理解巩固精品题练习(37)及答案06-08
软银集团跟阿里巴巴是什么关系?02-13
RationalDMIS快速使用手册08-14
学生游玩安全注意事项08-08
- KBZT-IV6301140Z防爆电器智能型综合保护特性试验台
- 河南省2016年上半年电机装配工:电力机车电工考试试题
- 施工组织
- 化学学习经验交流(精选多篇)
- LPC2114中文翻译 - 图文
- 新北师大版一年级数学上册第六单元《认识图形》教学设计
- 过程控制试题一及答案
- 八年级物理下册 9.1 压强(第1课时)学案(无答案)(新版)新人
- 《重庆市企业投资项目核准和备案管理办法(2017年本)》(渝府发〔2
- 中国带鱼行业市场规模分析及发展趋势预测报告2016-2021年
- 教师招聘面试
- 政治经济学单选题
- 2013房地产开发与经营复习题
- 大学英语2(1~5单元)
- 刚体力学基础习题思考题
- 电梯安装、维修、改造程序文件
- 2015年专业设计服务行业现状及发展趋势分析
- 哈尔滨师范大学2016年硕士研究生招生简章 - 图文
- 《童年的秘密》对当代幼儿教师的启示
- 《草原就是我的家》音乐教学设计
- 中英文版
- 原理
- 通信
- 论文
- 微生物学试题一
- 浙江省温州市2018届高三普通高中高考语数英适应性测试英语试题Wo
- 高二(理科)数学第一学期期中试卷
- VBA编程技巧 之 字典对象使用经验谈
- 06病句修改专题之六:不合逻辑(精心校对,无任何错误,附答案解
- 施奈德系列明PLC指示灯说明
- 假如我是一名公关经理
- 全国高等教育自学考试现代管理学试题及答案05-12
- 介值定理及其应用
- 高考语文 古代诗歌鉴赏之选择题常见错项例析
- 环境保护
- XX物业保洁绿化操作手册
- 物流管理口试(12题)
- 7压强
- 机械桩调整开挖方案的请示
- 学生会工作总结 XX年大学学生会秘书处工作总结
- 交际大师
- 数据结构之编写冒泡排序算法
- 小学三年级数学笔算练习题(660题)我是计算小能手
- 统计学课后习题部分题目答案